The Navy was the last of the military branches to address race relations in the early seventies. There were inequities within the Navy that took a race riot aboard two major warships to bring very real issues to light about racial injustice. Read about it here:
On 12 October, a prolonged and bloody riot erupted on board the carrier Kitty Hawk (CVA-63). Bands of marauding blacks, charging racist practices, rampaged through the ship, senselessly lashing at whites with chains and wrenches. Forty-seven men, 40 of them white, were injured, three of them seriously.
The USS Kitty Hawk riot was a racial conflict between white and black sailors aboard the United States Navy aircraft carrier Kitty Hawk on the night of 12–13 October 1972, while positioned at Yankee Station off the coast of North Vietnam during the Vietnam War.
Background
In the early days of the Vietnam War, African-American service members represented less than five percent of personnel in the United States Navy. The draft enticed men of all races to enlist in the Navy as a way to avoid heavy combat. This resulted in stiff competition, allowing Navy recruiters to enlist only the top performers on the Armed Forces Qualification Test. This was known as “Qualitative Recruitment”—recruiting the “highest quality” sailors, of whom nearly all happened to be white, as the quality of the education that white candidates had received was far superior to that of the black candidates. This made it improbable for black candidates to ever really compete with their white counterparts.
By 1971, after President Richard Nixon sought to create an all-volunteer military and the U.S. had begun to disengage from Vietnam, the number of men drafted dramatically decreased, and demand to join the Navy decreased with it. The Navy recruitment quota fell by over fifty percent from 1971 to 1972, which resulted in the Navy needing black men to achieve its recruitment goals.
Black men joined the Navy at a high rate, increasing their overall representation to twenty percent. Due to scoring lower on their qualification exams, blacks were more likely to be placed in less desirable jobs. Whites were often promoted to the more desirable jobs and accounted for 99% of the Navy’s officers.
Racial tensions among the crew
By October 1972, the majority of the black enlisted sailors on the aircraft carrier Kitty Hawk had been serving for less than a year. Of approximately 4,500 sailors on the ship, less than seven percent were black. Racial tensions were reportedly high on the ship. Politically, black sailors tended to support the advancement of social minorities in the Navy, views which conflicted with the obstacles they were faced with due to their lack of education. This created hostility on the ship and compounded the frustration the sailors felt from being at sea for nearly eight months.
Subic Bay
The first racial incident occurred at Subic Bay Naval Base, in Olongapo, Philippines. Racial segregation was enforced in Olongapo – the white section was known as “The Strip,” while the black section was known as “The Jungle.” On the night of 8 October 1972, a fight between black and white sailors broke out at the base enlisted men’s club. The situation escalated when a black sailor took to the stage and began voicing his opposition to the “white man’s war” and advocating “black power”, leading to a white sailor throwing a glass at the black sailor’s head. The brawl spread throughout the club and ultimately was broken up by base Marines. The black sailors were told not to go back to the EM Club.
Around 12:30 am on 9 October, another incident occurred when Dwight Horton, a black airman en route to Kitty Hawk, was arrested for fighting with two white petty officers. Horton asserted that the non-commissioned officers beat him. He argued he could not fight back because his arm was in a cast. When he returned to Kitty Hawk, Horton told the other black sailors about what happened, which further agitated them.
Sampaguita Club
On 10 October 1972, the black sailors decided to disrupt a favorite hangout of white sailors on The Strip – the Sampaguita Club – to retaliate against Horton’s treatment. That night was designated “Soul Night” at the club, which was the only night black sailors were welcome. Around 9:00 pm, a petty scuffle began when a black sailor punched a white shore patrolman for tapping him on the shoulder. To keep the situation from escalating, fifteen additional shore patrolmen were summoned to monitor the club.
At around 1:00 am, ten black sailors walked on stage and began “dapping” each other – exchanging physical gestures of greeting common in African-American communities – which provoked the white sailors in the audience. As the white sailors began berating the black sailors with epithets, the black sailors in the crowd voiced their solidarity. Meanwhile, outside the club, Horton arrived and threw a punch at another shore patrolman, distracting the patrolmen standing guard. White sailors began throwing beer bottles at the black sailors on stage, resulting in another brawl between black and white sailors that was again broken up by base Marines.
The following morning the sailors returned to Kitty Hawk, bloodied and bruised from the previous night, and the ship went to sea.
Incident
On the afternoon of 12 October, while Kitty Hawk was participating in Operation Linebacker off the coast of North Vietnam, three black sailors went on deck. The three were approached by two Marines who told them, “You blacks can’t walk in over twos.” When the black sailors ignored them and kept walking, one of the Marines used a nightstick to put one of the sailors, Perry Pettus, into a stranglehold. When Captain Marland Townsend Jr. of Kitty Hawk learned of the incident, he apologized to the three black sailors. Word of the incident made its rounds among black sailors, who were already incensed by events at Subic Bay.
Thirty minutes after flight operations, one of those black sailors, 18-year-old black Airman Apprentice Terry Avinger, went to the mess deck to eat and requested two sandwiches. A white mess cook refused and limited Avinger to one sandwich. Avinger then reached across the food line and took another sandwich, which resulted in a shouting match between him and the mess cook. Things escalated after another white mess cook, organizing food trays, stepped on a black sailor’s foot.
Upset about what transpired, Avinger went to a bunk area where black sailors regularly got together and expressed his frustration about the way they were being subjugated by whites on the ship, telling them he regretted “that he didn’t just beat the racist cracker’s ass right there.” He railed that “black sailors on the Kitty Hawk had had enough and it was time to stand up for themselves.” The black sailors then went into the ship’s passageway and armed themselves with makeshift weapons – broom handles, wrenches, a foam fog nozzle and pieces of pipe. They then began beating white sailors and vandalized some of the ship’s compartments.
Around 8:00 p.m., a white cook called for the Marine detachment on board. When the white Marines arrived, they ordered the black sailors to the aft mess. The black sailors thought that the Marines were corralling them there in order to beat or kill them. This resulted in a stand-off between the two groups.
News of what was happening reached Kitty Hawk‘s half‐black/half‐Native executive officer, Commander Ben Cloud, who had been aboard the ship for eight weeks. Informed that the situation was potentially deadly, Cloud went on the ship’s communication system and ordered the violence to stop, pleading for the black sailors to go to the aft mess and for the Marines to stand down and go to the forecastle. Cloud was unaware that Captain Townsend had also been briefed on what was happening and was on his way to the mess deck.
Cloud went to the mess deck to talk to the black sailors for about an hour, trying to calm them down and assure them that he could be trusted: “For the first time, you have a brother who is an executive officer. My door is always open.” Their anger subsided, the black sailors gave a Black Power salute in solidarity to Cloud, who returned the salute. The black sailors celebrated, feeling that they had someone in a position of authority who was sympathetic to their treatment on board. Cloud then dismissed the sailors and told them to get back to work. Townsend arrived on the mess deck and, witnessing Cloud’s handling of the situation, disagreed with his method. He left the mess deck and summoned the Marine detachment, ordering them to increase patrols in the black compartments.
Despite the de-escalation, tensions were still high. Groups of between five and twenty-five black sailors continued to roam Kitty Hawk, attacking whites at random throughout the night. Sleeping sailors were pulled from their racks and beaten with fists, chains, wrenches and broom handles, with many also shouting epithets such as, “Kill the white trash!” The mess cook who had earlier confronted Avinger was found and beaten after a mock trial. Cloud again intervened when he saw some black sailors heading to the forecastle, where the Marines had been ordered to go. By Cloud’s own admission, “he believed that had he not been black he would have been killed on the spot.” Cloud talked to the sailors for two hours, appealing to them not as a senior officer but “as one black to another.”
By 2:30 am, Cloud had calmed the black sailors and persuaded them to relinquish their weapons. About forty sailors went to the mess deck to eat, play cards and listen to music along with a few white sailors. At 3:00 a.m., Townsend told Cloud he did not want large groups of blacks congregating in the mess hall, and likened the gathering to a “victory party.” Townsend and Cloud dispersed the group and met with any sailors who were still upset in the forecastle until 5:00 a.m.
Many white sailors aboard the massive ship were unaware that the incident had occurred, and began to hear rumors when they awoke. Becoming increasingly angry, about 150 white sailors began to arm themselves and congregated in a berthing compartment, readying themselves for what they thought would be an outright racial battle for control of Kitty Hawk. Hearing of the discord, Cloud went to address the group, who dismissed him as being “nothing more than a nigger, like the rest of them.” When Cloud pulled rank on them and threatened them with legal action if they proceeded, the white sailors dispersed. Cloud reported the incident to Townsend and then continued to talk to concerned sailors – both white and black – throughout the morning, reducing the threat of white retaliation.
By 7:58 a.m., the confrontation had completely ended, and the Kitty Hawk resumed bombing North Vietnam.
In total, the incident left forty white sailors and six black sailors injured, including three who had to be evacuated to onshore medical facilities.
Wallace Green served on USS Kitty Hawk during the October 1972 race riot. In this clip, he talks about his experiences during the riot.
Courts-martial
Six weeks after the incident, Kitty Hawk returned to San Diego, California, where twenty-seven black sailors were arrested and charged. No white sailors were arrested. Twenty-one of those charged requested a court martial trial.
Lawyers for the black sailors stressed the bias shown in the pre-trial report against the black sailors, stating that it only contained testimony from prosecution witnesses. By December, Congress had investigated the incident and called Townsend and Cloud to testify. Most of those who requested a court martial were also invited to testify, but they all declined and no subpoenas were issued to force them to do so.
In January 1973, before a Navy court-martial, Cloud testified that the fighting erupted when Marines, on orders to break up groups of three or more sailors, only enforced the order against black sailors. He further testified that he had been threatened by black and white sailors alike, and that during the fighting between black sailors and Marines he witnessed a white sailor seemingly directing Marines toward black sailors. He noted that Townsend requested that the white sailor be identified, “but this was not done.”
In February, on behalf of seventeen of the black sailors, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) brought a complaint against a prosecutor for racial prejudice in an attempt to get the charges against the black sailors dismissed. The complaint also accused Michael A. Laurie, a white sailor who had been a key government witness, for perjury. Citing tape recordings of Laurie admitting that white sailors had “exaggerated” the violence of black sailors; then later affirming that he had lied about black sailors when he was asked outright. Laurie elaborated that, despite not seeing any black sailors actually hit any white sailors, white sailors would say that they did. Laurie also demonstrated racist leanings when he expressed his regret for not being armed on the night of the riot since it would have allowed him to have killed “at least 30 of them [black sailors].”
In April 1973, the courts martial concluded with a total of twenty-seven trials.
Aftermath
The events on Kitty Hawk inspired other ship riots and protests in the months that followed. In October, around the same time as the events aboard Kitty Hawk, a series of isolated interracial attacks occurred aboard USS Constellation. On November 3, as Constellation was sailing toward San Diego, black sailors staged a sit-down strike in the enlisted men’s mess deck. The strike was chaotic, but one central grievance was that six black sailors were to be given general discharges rather than honorable discharges. Captain Ward avoided meeting directly with the men because, according to a public relations officer, that would have implied a “recognition of some sort of union” and a “breakdown of the chain of command.” Seaman Edward A. Martinez was elected as a representative, but attempts at mediation with an officer, Commander Yacabucci, did not succeed in defusing the situation. At the dock in San Diego on Nov. 4, there was another sit-down protest, and 120 sailors who did not return to the ship were charged with being ashore without leave, receiving light punishments. The Navy avoided describing the events as a mutiny.
The Navy officially defined the incident aboard Kitty Hawk as a race riot. However, only four sailors were convicted of rioting, with two of those pleading guilty in exchange for reduced sentences. Fourteen were convicted of assault. Four were found not guilty of all charges. Five sailors had the charges dropped against them, and seven were sentenced to the brig. Most were given a demotion in rank.
Roy Wilkins, executive director of the NAACP, called the Navy’s handling of the incident a “despicable perversion of justice” of the black sailors who were victims of “a spurious effort to discredit them, categorize them, and keep them in menial, low-paying jobs.” Many black officers also expressed that the riot was inevitable because the Navy was inept at treating black sailors as sailors rather than as blacks, which created differences in the way black sailors were treated over issues such as “promotion, assignments, interracial relationships.” However, despite these accounts, Floyd Hicks, the Chairman of the House Armed Services Subcommittee, determined that the incident “consisted of unprovoked attacks” by blacks against whites.
The subcommittee wrote that “the riot on Kitty Hawk consisted of unprovoked assaults by a very few men, most of whom were below-average mental capacity, most of whom had been aboard for less than one year, and all of whom were black. This group, as a whole, acted as ‘thugs’ which raises doubt as to whether they should ever have been accepted into military service in the first place.” The Subcommittee’s final report concluded:
The subcommittee has been unable to determine any precipitous cause for rampage aboard U.S.S. Kitty Hawk. Not only was there not one case wherein racial discrimination could be pinpointed, but there is no evidence which indicated that the blacks who participated in that incident perceived racial discrimination, either in general or any specific, of such a nature as to justify belief that violent reaction was required … The members of the subcommittee did not find and are unaware of any instances of institutional discrimination on the part of the Navy toward any group of persons, majority or minority … Black unity, the drive toward togetherness on the part of blacks, has resulted in a tendency on the part of black sailors to polarize. This results in a grievance of one black, real or fancied, becoming the grievance of many … The Navy’s recruitment program for most of 1972 which resulted in the lowering of standards for enlistment, accepting a greater percentage of mental category IV and those in the lower half of category III, not requiring recruits in these categories to have completed their high school education, and accepting these people without sufficient analysis of their previous offense records, has created many of the problems the Navy is experiencing today.
These incidents indicated the depth of the racial problems in the Navy. All the services had experienced similar problems earlier, but the Navy had lagged behind the others in addressing the issues that contributed to the racial tensions that erupted on the Kitty Hawk and the Hassayampa. Admiral Elmo R. Zumwalt, Jr., Chief of Naval Operations, instituted new race relations programs and made significant changes to Naval Regulations to address many of the very real issues raised by the Black sailors regarding racial injustice in the Navy.
Thank you for taking the time to read this. Should you have a question or comment about this article, then scroll down to the comment section below to leave your response.
If you want to learn more about the Vietnam War and its Warriors, then subscribe to this blog and get notified by email or your feed reader every time a new story, picture, video or changes occur on this website – the button is located at the top right of this page.
I’ve also created a poll to help identify my website audience – before leaving, can you please click HERE and choose the one item best describing you. Thank you in advance!
Very good article. Having served aboard the Constellation 65-68 I saw the initial tensions brewing.
The Navy did not provide integration for minorities very well during those times, even though the signing of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 they were mandated to do so. I did Shore Patrol duty in 1966 Olongapo city once and I was assigned to the “Jungle” which I did not know it was called that. I was a young 19 year old who was naive to the reality. That is when I realized there was still serious segregation and condoned by the Navy. I know Olongapo is a Philippine town and they set the rules, but the Navy should have stepped in.
The USS Kitty Hawk riot was an incredibly important moment in history, as it helped bring attention to the racial injustices that were taking place in the military. I find it incredibly sad that it took an event like this to draw attention to the problem. It is a reminder that even today, these issues are still present in the world and must be addressed. How do you think the Navy has been able to address these issues in the years since this riot?
I operated out of the 5th Marine CP in the Spring of 1970. The unofficial segregation and prejudicial treatment of black marines were blatant. Unarmed marines marched outside the wire, took weapons and ammo from incoming patrols, and then went out while the disarmed marines were marched back into the camp. A frag killed HHC Commander in his hooch. Blamed on a black marine… Things were very tense.
Thanks for such an informative article of an incidence I had never heard of. While I was in Nam in ‘69 we had a fragging of a black hootch (one hospitalized) after some scattered fights earlier in the evening. Lots of tension all the time.
Rhe military lowered its recruiting and draft standards too low by 1968. McNamara’s 15, which referred toi those with GT scores that low were admitted. These men were relegated to menial jobs becuse they were illiterate and English language skills for many were very low. Many spoke Spanish and still failed to be able to communicate effectively with better educated and intelligent Latino soldiers/sailors etc.
The article failed to mention that the Blacks with the minimum amount of time in the service possibly had been inspired by the anti-war and racial tensions that permeated the civilian society of the day. The Black Panthers were a huge political and racial influence on these sailors. While we are suppossed to leave those issues behind as military members, those more militant likley refused to do so.
I recall the night MLK was murdered and we were put on Alert as Oakland and SF were rioting. I was an E3 at an Army Nike battery at the time. It wasn’t a pretty sight to see some southern whites gleefully celebrating MLK’s death. Same issues for ther MP’s, many were drafted, perhaps too young to assume the authority granted them and had pre-conceived ideas about race and other issues as young men that aren’t mature as an older and more responsible adult would have become.
I am sad that the military ended the draft. It made me grow up faster than maybe I would have by being exposed to other people and cultures that otherwise I would have never experienced. As I was them and still am now, I am against the show of force to draw attention to grievances. The command on the Kitty Hawk was very lucky they had Commander Cloud aboard because the Captain was ill-prepared for the insurrections and the ways that it could have been quelled. Especially at sea.
Race problems were evident in the military when I first enlisted 1962, at Ft Benning Jump school class 43, October 1962 were many racial instigated fights in the barracks. Race Riot in Baumholder Germany @1965.
We had trouble in Germany like that. You would be in a club around quitting time and someone would lock the doors. Usually blacks and the fighting would start. It’s a shame the military had to drop it’s standards, we see the results today. TC
I remb a lot of this having been on the gun line at the time and then followed that with a tour of recruiting. During early 70’s we were forced to take a lot of Group IV instead of I or II it was called McNamara’s plan.
Very good article. Having served aboard the Constellation 65-68 I saw the initial tensions brewing.
The Navy did not provide integration for minorities very well during those times, even though the signing of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 they were mandated to do so. I did Shore Patrol duty in 1966 Olongapo city once and I was assigned to the “Jungle” which I did not know it was called that. I was a young 19 year old who was naive to the reality. That is when I realized there was still serious segregation and condoned by the Navy. I know Olongapo is a Philippine town and they set the rules, but the Navy should have stepped in.
LikeLike
The USS Kitty Hawk riot was an incredibly important moment in history, as it helped bring attention to the racial injustices that were taking place in the military. I find it incredibly sad that it took an event like this to draw attention to the problem. It is a reminder that even today, these issues are still present in the world and must be addressed. How do you think the Navy has been able to address these issues in the years since this riot?
LikeLike
I operated out of the 5th Marine CP in the Spring of 1970. The unofficial segregation and prejudicial treatment of black marines were blatant. Unarmed marines marched outside the wire, took weapons and ammo from incoming patrols, and then went out while the disarmed marines were marched back into the camp. A frag killed HHC Commander in his hooch. Blamed on a black marine… Things were very tense.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for such an informative article of an incidence I had never heard of. While I was in Nam in ‘69 we had a fragging of a black hootch (one hospitalized) after some scattered fights earlier in the evening. Lots of tension all the time.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Rhe military lowered its recruiting and draft standards too low by 1968. McNamara’s 15, which referred toi those with GT scores that low were admitted. These men were relegated to menial jobs becuse they were illiterate and English language skills for many were very low. Many spoke Spanish and still failed to be able to communicate effectively with better educated and intelligent Latino soldiers/sailors etc.
The article failed to mention that the Blacks with the minimum amount of time in the service possibly had been inspired by the anti-war and racial tensions that permeated the civilian society of the day. The Black Panthers were a huge political and racial influence on these sailors. While we are suppossed to leave those issues behind as military members, those more militant likley refused to do so.
I recall the night MLK was murdered and we were put on Alert as Oakland and SF were rioting. I was an E3 at an Army Nike battery at the time. It wasn’t a pretty sight to see some southern whites gleefully celebrating MLK’s death. Same issues for ther MP’s, many were drafted, perhaps too young to assume the authority granted them and had pre-conceived ideas about race and other issues as young men that aren’t mature as an older and more responsible adult would have become.
I am sad that the military ended the draft. It made me grow up faster than maybe I would have by being exposed to other people and cultures that otherwise I would have never experienced. As I was them and still am now, I am against the show of force to draw attention to grievances. The command on the Kitty Hawk was very lucky they had Commander Cloud aboard because the Captain was ill-prepared for the insurrections and the ways that it could have been quelled. Especially at sea.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Race problems were evident in the military when I first enlisted 1962, at Ft Benning Jump school class 43, October 1962 were many racial instigated fights in the barracks. Race Riot in Baumholder Germany @1965.
LikeLiked by 1 person
We had trouble in Germany like that. You would be in a club around quitting time and someone would lock the doors. Usually blacks and the fighting would start. It’s a shame the military had to drop it’s standards, we see the results today. TC
LikeLiked by 1 person
I remb a lot of this having been on the gun line at the time and then followed that with a tour of recruiting. During early 70’s we were forced to take a lot of Group IV instead of I or II it was called McNamara’s plan.
LikeLiked by 1 person